data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b10a1/b10a1789de8b12944387253f98a89c89315f3201" alt=""
Guilty as charged
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/260ba/260bad903fd368eb915ca5f824e2570768afe67d" alt=""
North-South have reached a very poor contract. As so often, each of the two players considers that his partner is responsible for the accident. And you, what do you think?
Problem #1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8c1b9/8c1b9c3fdff383bfb52ca85412025201a1dc9bf4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8dcf/f8dcfabb731cbb99f1902f03b7ef2a63a109e9d5" alt=""
The facts :
Our two friends went down in 1 No-Trump and realized that they could have easily made 2 Hearts, without having too many regrets when their opponents produced the same result.
Arguments :
North : “Well, I would have liked to bid 2♥ over 1NT and accept playing in a possible 4-3 fit, but if I’m not mistaken even though it shows this distribution, this bid is made with hands in the 15-17HCP range and suggests playing game.”
South : “My 1NT bid is correct, it’s the famous “all is possible” bid with 6-10HCP and any distribution ‒ to repeat Hearts, I would need six cards except opposite a 1NT rebid.”
You need a Funbridge Premium+ subscription to keep reading.
Do you want to keep reading the article? Please log in to a valid Premium+ account.